lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V6 net] net: mana: Fix MANA VF unload when hardware is
From
在 2023/7/26 21:15, Souradeep Chakrabarti 写道:
> When unloading the MANA driver, mana_dealloc_queues() waits for the MANA
> hardware to complete any inflight packets and set the pending send count
> to zero. But if the hardware has failed, mana_dealloc_queues()
> could wait forever.
>
> Fix this by adding a timeout to the wait. Set the timeout to 120 seconds,
> which is a somewhat arbitrary value that is more than long enough for
> functional hardware to complete any sends.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: ca9c54d2d6a5 ("net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA)")
>
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> V5 -> V6:
> * Added pcie_flr to reset the pci after timeout.
> * Fixed the position of changelog.
> * Removed unused variable like cq.
>
> V4 -> V5:
> * Added fixes tag
> * Changed the usleep_range from static to incremental value.
> * Initialized timeout in the begining.
>
> V3 -> V4:
> * Removed the unnecessary braces from mana_dealloc_queues().
>
> V2 -> V3:
> * Removed the unnecessary braces from mana_dealloc_queues().
>
> V1 -> V2:
> * Added net branch
> * Removed the typecasting to (struct mana_context*) of void pointer
> * Repositioned timeout variable in mana_dealloc_queues()
> * Repositioned vf_unload_timeout in mana_context struct, to utilise the
> 6 bytes hole
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> index a499e460594b..ea039e2d4c4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> #include <linux/filter.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> #include <net/checksum.h>
> #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
> @@ -2345,9 +2346,12 @@ int mana_attach(struct net_device *ndev)
> static int mana_dealloc_queues(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct mana_port_context *apc = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + 120 * HZ;
> struct gdma_dev *gd = apc->ac->gdma_dev;
> struct mana_txq *txq;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> int i, err;
> + u32 tsleep;
>
> if (apc->port_is_up)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2363,15 +2367,41 @@ static int mana_dealloc_queues(struct net_device *ndev)
> * to false, but it doesn't matter since mana_start_xmit() drops any
> * new packets due to apc->port_is_up being false.
> *
> - * Drain all the in-flight TX packets
> + * Drain all the in-flight TX packets.
> + * A timeout of 120 seconds for all the queues is used.
> + * This will break the while loop when h/w is not responding.
> + * This value of 120 has been decided here considering max
> + * number of queues.
> */
> +
> for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
> txq = &apc->tx_qp[i].txq;
> -
> - while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends) > 0)
> - usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + tsleep = 1000;
> + while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends) > 0 &&
> + time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + usleep_range(tsleep, tsleep + 1000);
> + tsleep <<= 1;
> + }
> + if (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends)) {
> + err = pcie_flr(to_pci_dev(gd->gdma_context->dev));
> + if (err) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "flr failed %d with %d pkts pending in txq %u\n",
> + err, atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends),
> + txq->gdma_txq_id);
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
> + txq = &apc->tx_qp[i].txq;
> + while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends)) {
> + skb = skb_dequeue(&txq->pending_skbs);
> + mana_unmap_skb(skb, apc);
> + dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
> + atomic_sub(1, &txq->pending_sends);
> + }
If I get this commit correctly, txq->pending_sends should be equal to
the length of txq->pending_skbs?

If yes, can we only handle the pending_skbs?

the above snippet can be changed to as below? So the performance is better?
"
while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&txq->pending_skbs))) {
mana_unmap_skb(skb, apc);
dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
}
atomic_set(&txq->pending_sends, 0);
"

Zhu Yanjun

> + }
> /* We're 100% sure the queues can no longer be woken up, because
> * we're sure now mana_poll_tx_cq() can't be running.
> */

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-27 05:11    [W:0.036 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site