Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:35:33 +0200 | Subject | Re: [v2 PATCH] arm64: dts: stratix10: add new compatible for Intel SoCFPGA Stratix10 platform | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 21/07/2023 11:29, Li, Meng wrote: >>>>>> NAK, don't fake reviews. This very impolite and destroys entire trust. >>>>>> The model of upstream collaboration depends on the trust, which is >>>>>> now gone for Windriver. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No! I don't fake a tag. >>>> >>>> Really? Then I ask second time - from where did you get it? Provide a link. >>>> >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230718030851.2014306-1-Meng.Li@windrive >>> r.com/T/ >> >> So where is it? You pointed to your email. Where is the tag? >> > > Sorry! Maybe I have wrong understanding about TAG. > From my perspective, If reviewers ask question or give some advices to the patch, I need to add the tag to v2.
This is some crazy idea. So you want to sprinkle some tags, just because someone disagrees with your patch and explicitly gives you a NAK, which means NOT-Ack, Not-acknowledge, not accepted, not in good shape.
I actually wonder why adding an acknowledging tag for the patch, if I disagreed and gave you NAK. Following your logic, this should be a NAK tag. This I could understand. But giving acknowledge when I clearly said patch is wrong?
Read all process documents before submitting new patches: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/
> If it is not allowed, I apologize for that.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |