lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 4/5] net: hpe: Add GXP UMAC Driver
From
Le 21/07/2023 à 23:20, nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org a écrit :
> From: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
>
> The GXP contains two Ethernet MACs that can be connected externally
> to several physical devices. From an external interface perspective
> the BMC provides two SERDES interface connections capable of either
> SGMII or 1000Base-X operation. The BMC also provides a RMII interface
> for sideband connections to external Ethernet controllers.
>
> The primary MAC (umac0) can be mapped to either SGMII/1000-BaseX
> SERDES interface. The secondary MAC (umac1) can be mapped to only
> the second SGMII/1000-Base X Serdes interface or it can be mapped for
> RMII sideband.
>
> The MDIO(mdio0) interface from the primary MAC (umac0) is used for
> external PHY status and configuration. The MDIO(mdio1) interface from
> the secondary MAC (umac1) is routed to the SGMII/100Base-X IP blocks
> on the two SERDES interface connections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> ---

[...]

> +static int umac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> +{
> + struct umac_priv *umac = container_of(napi, struct umac_priv, napi);
> + struct net_device *ndev = umac->ndev;
> + unsigned int value;
> + int rx_done = 0;

No need to init.

> +
> + umac_tx_done(ndev);
> +
> + rx_done = umac_rx(ndev, budget);
> +
> + if (rx_done < budget) {
> + napi_complete_done(napi, rx_done);
> + /* clear rx interrupt */
> + value = readl(umac->base + UMAC_INTERRUPT);
> + value &= ~UMAC_RX_INT;
> + writel(value, umac->base + UMAC_INTERRUPT);
> +
> + /* enable interrupt */
> + umac_irq_enable(umac);
> + }
> +
> + return rx_done;
> +}

[...]

> +static int umac_setup_phy(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct umac_priv *umac = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct platform_device *pdev = umac->pdev;
> + struct device_node *phy_handle;
> + phy_interface_t interface;
> + struct device_node *eth_ports_np;
> + struct device_node *port_np;
> + int ret;
> + int err;

Could there be only one ret ou err variable?

> + int i;
> +
> + /* Get child node ethernet-ports. */
> + eth_ports_np = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "ethernet-ports");
> + if (!eth_ports_np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No ethernet-ports child node found!\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_PORTS; i++) {
> + /* Get port@i of node ethernet-ports */
> + port_np = gxp_umac_get_eth_child_node(eth_ports_np, i);
> + if (!port_np)
> + break;
> +
> + if (i == INTERNAL_PORT) {
> + phy_handle = of_parse_phandle(port_np, "phy-handle", 0);
> + if (phy_handle) {
> + umac->int_phy_dev = of_phy_find_device(phy_handle);
> + if (!umac->int_phy_dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + umac_int_phy_init(umac);
> + } else {
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(phy_handle),
> + "Failed to map phy-handle for port %d", i);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (i == EXTERNAL_PORT) {
> + phy_handle = of_parse_phandle(port_np, "phy-handle", 0);
> + if (phy_handle) {
> + /* register the phy board fixup */
> + ret = phy_register_fixup_for_uid(0x01410dd1, 0xffffffff,
> + umac_phy_fixup);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot register phy board fixup\n");
> +
> + err = of_get_phy_mode(phy_handle, &interface);
> + if (err)
> + interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
> +
> + umac->phy_dev = of_phy_connect(ndev, phy_handle,
> + &umac_adjust_link,
> + 0, interface);
> +
> + if (!umac->phy_dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* If the specified phy-handle has a fixed-link declaration, use the
> + * fixed-link properties to set the configuration for the PHY
> + */
> + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(phy_handle)) {
> + struct device_node *fixed_link_node =
> + of_get_child_by_name(phy_handle,
> + "fixed-link");
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(fixed_link_node, "speed",
> + &umac->phy_dev->speed)) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "Invalid fixed-link specified.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + umac->phy_dev->duplex =
> + of_property_read_bool(fixed_link_node,
> + "full-duplex");
> + umac->phy_dev->pause =
> + of_property_read_bool(fixed_link_node,
> + "pause");
> + umac->phy_dev->asym_pause =
> + of_property_read_bool(fixed_link_node,
> + "asym-pause");
> + umac->phy_dev->autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;
> + __clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Autoneg_BIT,
> + umac->phy_dev->advertising);
> + }
> + } else {
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(phy_handle),
> + "Failed to map phy-handle for port %d", i);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int umac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct umac_priv *umac;
> + struct net_device *ndev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(*umac));

devm_alloc_etherdev()?
This saves a lot of free_netdev() below.

> + if (!ndev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &pdev->dev);
> +
> + umac = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + umac->pdev = pdev;
> + umac->ndev = ndev;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "failed to get I/O memory\n");
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + umac->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> + if (!umac->base) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "failed to remap I/O memory\n");
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (ndev->irq < 0) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "failed to get irq\n");
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev);
> +
> + ndev->netdev_ops = &umac_netdev_ops;
> + ndev->ethtool_ops = &umac_ethtool_ops;
> +
> + umac_init_mac_address(ndev);
> + umac_channel_disable(umac);
> + ret = umac_setup_phy(ndev);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "failed to setup phy ret=%d\n", ret);

free_netdev() missing. (should alloc_etherdev() be left as-is)

> + return -ENODEV;

Does it makes sense to return ret as-is?

> + }
> +
> + umac->use_ncsi = false;
> + if (of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "use-ncsi", NULL)) {
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_NCSI)) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "NCSI stack not enabled\n");
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return 0;

So register_netdev() below could not be called.
In such a case unregister_netdev() would be unbalanced in the remove
function. Using devm_register_netdev() below would avoid it.

> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Using NCSI interface\n");
> + umac->use_ncsi = true;
> + umac->ncsidev = ncsi_register_dev(ndev, umac_ncsi_handler);
> + if (!umac->ncsidev) {
> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + netif_napi_add(ndev, &umac->napi, umac_poll);
> + ret = register_netdev(ndev);

devm_register_netdev()

> + if (ret != 0) {
> + netdev_err(ndev, "failed to register UMAC ret=%d\n", ret);
> + netif_napi_del(&umac->napi);

(devm_)free_netdev() already call netif_napi_del().

> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return -ENODEV;

Does it makes sense to return ret as-is?

> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int umac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct umac_priv *umac = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +
> + unregister_netdev(ndev);
> + iounmap(umac->base);

umac->base is a managed resource.

> + free_netdev(ndev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id umac_of_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "hpe, gxp-umac", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, umac_of_matches);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver umac_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "gxp-umac",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(umac_of_matches),
> + },
> + .probe = umac_probe,
> + .remove = umac_remove,

With the above proposed changes, the remove function could be removed.

> +};

[...]


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-22 00:00    [W:0.136 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site