Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:14:57 +0000 | From | "Drew B." <> | Subject | Re: Misbehavior with setsockopt timeval structure with -fpack-struct enabled |
| |
Hi David! Thanks for your answer. Just to feed my curiosity, why? Of course I could use: #pragma pack(1, push) ... #pragma pack(pop) to pack only what is needed, but in the first place I was thinking about keeping as much free memory as possible (to make things optimized). And keep other things intact, but is it not a good practice placing -fpack-struct into compile-time params?
Kind regards, Drew.
On 2023-07-19 13:36, David Laight wrote: > ... >> with -fpack-struct enabled, > > Don't even think of enabling that. > > David > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, > MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
| |