Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:45:36 -1000 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions |
| |
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > I don't want to add another cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective control file. > One possibility is to keep another effective masks in the struct cpuset and > list both exclusive cpus set by the user and the effective ones side by > side, like "<cpus> (<effective_cpus>)" if they differ or some other format. > What do you think?
Hmm... if we go for separate effective mask, I think it'd be better to stay consistent with cpuset.cpus[.effective]. That's the convention both cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems already follow. I'm not sure what we'd gain by deviating.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |