Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jun 2023 19:06:51 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb.c: fix a bug within a BUG(): inconsistent pte comparison | From | John Hubbard <> |
| |
On 6/29/23 18:50, James Houghton wrote: > Hi John, > > Good catch, and thanks for the detailed explanation. It looks like > riscv and powerpc have equivalent problems in their huge_pte_alloc > implementations, perhaps it's worth taking a look at those. (riscv > looks like it has precisely the same problem except it's a WARN, but > powerpc looks more interesting.) > > Either way, > > Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Thanks for the ack, and yes, riscv and powerpc do look like the same problem to me, too. I'm glad you thought to look there, as I have fallen into tunnel vision while investigating this, heh.
OK, as long as I'm here, let me fix those up, too. I'll make those a separate patch, because they are still in the "fragile" state, rather than actually at the full crash state. :)
thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA
| |