Messages in this thread | | | From | Suren Baghdasaryan <> | Date | Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:27:07 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] mm: replace folio_lock_or_retry with folio_lock_fault |
| |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:22 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:23:17PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > Change folio_lock_or_retry to accept vm_fault struct and return the > > vm_fault_t directly. This will be used later to return additional > > information about the state of the mmap_lock upon return from this > > function. > > > > Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> > > The patch looks all fine to me except on the renaming.. > > *_fault() makes me think of a fault handler, while *_lock_or_retry() was > there for years and it still sounds better than the new one to me. > > Can we still come up with a better renaming, or just keep the name?
I thought about alternatives but could not find anything better. I can keep the old name if that is preferred.
> > Thanks, > > -- > Peter Xu > > -- > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com. >
| |