lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL infrastructure
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:28:20AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > Or is that wrapper only used for never-fail SEAMCALLs? If so, please
> > document it.
> >
>
> How about adding below?
>
> Use __seamcall() directly in cases that printing error message isn't
> desired, e.g., when SEAMCALL can legally fail with BUSY and the caller
> wants to retry.
>

Looks good to me.

--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-06-27 13:36    [W:0.185 / U:1.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site