Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:53:36 -0700 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API |
| |
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: > I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going > on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example: > 1) mode_set op removal > 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok - > that's the unfinished discussion) > 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds > reasonable, yet nothing changed > > I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and > over?
FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in refreshing the series.
But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover letter.
| |