Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:38:18 +0800 | From | kernel test robot <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V12 07/10] arm64/perf: Add PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA to events with has_branch_stack() |
| |
Hi Anshuman,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] [also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core acme/perf/core linus/master v6.4-rc6 next-20230615] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/drivers-perf-arm_pmu-Add-new-sched_task-callback/20230615-223352 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615133239.442736-8-anshuman.khandual%40arm.com patch subject: [PATCH V12 07/10] arm64/perf: Add PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA to events with has_branch_stack() config: arm-randconfig-r004-20230615 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230616/202306161016.jJeqG6mc-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): mkdir -p ~/bin wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi git remote add arm64 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git git fetch arm64 for-next/core git checkout arm64/for-next/core b4 shazam https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615133239.442736-8-anshuman.khandual@arm.com # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/perf/
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306161016.jJeqG6mc-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:148:45: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 148 | [C(DTLB)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_WR, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h:134:44: note: expanded from macro 'ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_WR' 134 | #define ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_WR 0x004F | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:140:2: note: previous initialization is here 140 | PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:43:31: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED' 43 | [0 ... C(RESULT_MAX) - 1] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:35:31: note: expanded from macro 'CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED' 35 | #define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:149:42: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 149 | [C(DTLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_RD, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h:131:50: note: expanded from macro 'ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_RD' 131 | #define ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_RD 0x004C | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:140:2: note: previous initialization is here 140 | PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:43:31: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED' 43 | [0 ... C(RESULT_MAX) - 1] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:35:31: note: expanded from macro 'CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED' 35 | #define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:150:43: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 150 | [C(DTLB)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_WR, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h:132:50: note: expanded from macro 'ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_WR' 132 | #define ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_L1D_TLB_REFILL_WR 0x004D | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:140:2: note: previous initialization is here 140 | PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:43:31: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED' 43 | [0 ... C(RESULT_MAX) - 1] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:35:31: note: expanded from macro 'CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED' 35 | #define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:152:44: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 152 | [C(NODE)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_RD, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h:148:46: note: expanded from macro 'ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_RD' 148 | #define ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_RD 0x0060 | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:140:2: note: previous initialization is here 140 | PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:43:31: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED' 43 | [0 ... C(RESULT_MAX) - 1] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:35:31: note: expanded from macro 'CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED' 35 | #define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:153:45: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 153 | [C(NODE)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_WR, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h:149:46: note: expanded from macro 'ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_WR' 149 | #define ARMV8_IMPDEF_PERFCTR_BUS_ACCESS_WR 0x0061 | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:140:2: note: previous initialization is here 140 | PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:43:31: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED' 43 | [0 ... C(RESULT_MAX) - 1] = CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h:35:31: note: expanded from macro 'CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED' 35 | #define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF | ^~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:714:3: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_enable'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 714 | armv8pmu_branch_enable(event); | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:720:3: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_disable'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 720 | armv8pmu_branch_disable(event); | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:805:4: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_read'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 805 | armv8pmu_branch_read(cpuc, event); | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:805:4: note: did you mean 'armv8pmu_pmcr_read'? drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:430:19: note: 'armv8pmu_pmcr_read' declared here 430 | static inline u32 armv8pmu_pmcr_read(void) | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:912:3: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_reset'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 912 | armv8pmu_branch_reset(); | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:987:3: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_reset'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 987 | armv8pmu_branch_reset(); | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:1026:8: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1026 | if (!armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid(event)) | ^ drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:1148:2: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_branch_probe'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1148 | armv8pmu_branch_probe(cpu_pmu); | ^ >> drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:1195:9: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1195 | ret = armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc(cpu_pmu); | ^ >> drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c:1201:4: error: call to undeclared function 'armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1201 | armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free(cpu_pmu); | ^ 55 warnings and 9 errors generated.
vim +/armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc +1195 drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
1176 1177 static int armv8pmu_probe_pmu(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) 1178 { 1179 struct armv8pmu_probe_info probe = { 1180 .pmu = cpu_pmu, 1181 .present = false, 1182 }; 1183 int ret; 1184 1185 ret = smp_call_function_any(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus, 1186 __armv8pmu_probe_pmu, 1187 &probe, 1); 1188 if (ret) 1189 return ret; 1190 1191 if (!probe.present) 1192 return -ENODEV; 1193 1194 if (cpu_pmu->has_branch_stack) { > 1195 ret = armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc(cpu_pmu); 1196 if (ret) 1197 return ret; 1198 1199 ret = branch_records_alloc(cpu_pmu); 1200 if (ret) { > 1201 armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free(cpu_pmu); 1202 return ret; 1203 } 1204 } 1205 return 0; 1206 } 1207
-- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
| |