Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Aidan MacDonald <> | Subject | [PATCH v1 5/6] regmap-irq: Minor adjustments to .handle_mask_sync() | Date | Tue, 9 May 2023 12:00:59 +0100 |
| |
If a .handle_mask_sync() callback is provided it supersedes all inbuilt handling of mask registers, and judging by the commit 69af4bcaa08d ("regmap-irq: Add handle_mask_sync() callback") it is intended to completely replace all default IRQ masking logic.
The implementation has two minor inconsistencies, which can be fixed without breaking compatibility:
(1) mask_base must be set to enable .handle_mask_sync(), even though mask_base is otherwise unused. This is easily fixed because mask_base is already optional.
(2) Unmask registers aren't accounted for -- they are part of the default IRQ masking logic and are just a bit-inverted version of mask registers. It would be a bad idea to allow them to be used at the same time as .handle_mask_sync(), as the result would be confusing and unmaintainable, so make sure this can't happen.
Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> --- drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c index 41568927aa4c..898d1c6c5b75 100644 --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c @@ -113,24 +113,22 @@ static void regmap_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data) * suppress pointless writes. */ for (i = 0; i < d->chip->num_regs; i++) { - if (d->mask_base) { - if (d->chip->handle_mask_sync) - d->chip->handle_mask_sync(d->map, i, - d->mask_buf_def[i], - d->mask_buf[i], - d->chip->irq_drv_data); - else { - reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i); - ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, - d->mask_buf_def[i], - d->mask_buf[i]); - if (ret) - dev_err(d->map->dev, "Failed to sync masks in %x\n", - reg); - } + if (d->chip->handle_mask_sync) + d->chip->handle_mask_sync(d->map, i, + d->mask_buf_def[i], + d->mask_buf[i], + d->chip->irq_drv_data); + + if (d->mask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) { + reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i); + ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, + d->mask_buf_def[i], + d->mask_buf[i]); + if (ret) + dev_err(d->map->dev, "Failed to sync masks in %x\n", reg); } - if (d->unmask_base) { + if (d->unmask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) { reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->unmask_base, i); ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, d->mask_buf_def[i], ~d->mask_buf[i]); @@ -786,28 +784,28 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, for (i = 0; i < chip->num_regs; i++) { d->mask_buf[i] = d->mask_buf_def[i]; - if (d->mask_base) { - if (chip->handle_mask_sync) { - ret = chip->handle_mask_sync(d->map, i, - d->mask_buf_def[i], - d->mask_buf[i], - chip->irq_drv_data); - if (ret) - goto err_alloc; - } else { - reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i); - ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, - d->mask_buf_def[i], - d->mask_buf[i]); - if (ret) { - dev_err(map->dev, "Failed to set masks in 0x%x: %d\n", - reg, ret); - goto err_alloc; - } + if (chip->handle_mask_sync) { + ret = chip->handle_mask_sync(d->map, i, + d->mask_buf_def[i], + d->mask_buf[i], + chip->irq_drv_data); + if (ret) + goto err_alloc; + } + + if (d->mask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) { + reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i); + ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, + d->mask_buf_def[i], + d->mask_buf[i]); + if (ret) { + dev_err(map->dev, "Failed to set masks in 0x%x: %d\n", + reg, ret); + goto err_alloc; } } - if (d->unmask_base) { + if (d->unmask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) { reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->unmask_base, i); ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg, d->mask_buf_def[i], ~d->mask_buf[i]); -- 2.39.2
| |