Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 May 2023 23:30:34 +0530 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL]: Generic phy updates for v6.4 |
| |
On 04-05-23, 10:23, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:31 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote: > > Sorry between vacation and travel, this was missed. > > > > No worries we have process to deal with this, so this shall go in as > > fixes.. I will do the needful shortly > > You need to do it *now*.
It was already done a bit ago and applied to my fixes and should be in -next tomorrow. I will wait a day before sending you fixes update.
> You should never have sent the pull request to me in the first place > if you hadn't checked the status in linux-next. > > The point of linux-next is to find failures. And if you don't then > *care* about the failures, then it has all become entirely pointless, > and it's effectively the same as if it had never been there in the > first place. > > So this needs to get fixed *PRONTO*, and it needs to never ever happen again.
Ack, agree I should have paid it more attention. Between vacation and travel and stuff I have missed it this time, will ensure this doesn't happen again.
> > Because if it does happen, I will consider your code to effectively > never have been in linux-next, and thus just not be an option for > pulling. > > This isn't debatable. You don't put things in linux-next, ignore the > reports, and then send things upstream anyway. > > If you don't have time to check the status of your tree in linux-next, > you don't have the time to do a pull request. That's just how it > works. > > Linus
-- ~Vinod
| |