lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for lucid ole pll ops
From
Hi Konrad,

Thanks for your review!

On 5/19/2023 6:39 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 19.05.2023 14:49, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks Konrad for your review!
>>
>> On 5/10/2023 1:36 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9.05.2023 18:12, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>>>> From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for lucid ole pll ops to configure and control the
>>>> lucid ole pll. The lucid ole pll has an additional test control
>>>> register which is required to be programmed, add support to
>>>> program the same.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> Isn't this commit "write to PLL_TEST_CTL_U2 on LUCID_EVO" instead?
>>>
>>> Meaninglessly duplicating ops does not seem useful.
>>>
>>> Konrad
>>
>> Though we are reusing same ops for EVO and OLE, PLL_TEST_CTL_U2 register programming is applicable only to OLE PLL type.
> Well, your patch makes it unconditional (modulo programmer error) so
> I think that makes little sense.. A comment would be enough, imo.
>
> Konrad
Yes, will remove the duplicate definitions and will reuse the existing ops.

> And PLL type is useful to properly refer respective hardware datasheets. Hence added separate ops for OLE PLL type.
>>

Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-24 16:29    [W:1.001 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site