Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 May 2023 21:38:17 -0700 | Subject | Re: | From | Yonghong Song <> |
| |
On 5/21/23 7:07 PM, Ze Gao wrote: > Oops, I missed that. Thanks for pointing that out, which I thought is > conditional use of rcu_is_watching before. > > One last point, I think we should double check on this > "fentry does not filter with !rcu_is_watching" > as quoted from Yonghong and argue whether it needs > the same check for fentry as well.
I would suggest that we address rcu_is_watching issue for fentry only if we do have a reproducible case to show something goes wrong...
> > Regards, > Ze
| |