lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 6.1 000/292] 6.1.30-rc1 review
    From
    Hi Naresh,

    On 23/05/2023 16:52, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
    > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 00:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
    > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.30 release.
    >> There are 292 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
    >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    >> let me know.
    >>
    >> Responses should be made by Wed, 24 May 2023 19:03:25 +0000.
    >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
    >>
    >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.30-rc1.gz
    >> or in the git tree and branch at:
    >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
    >> and the diffstat can be found below.
    >>
    >> thanks,
    >>
    >> greg k-h
    >
    >
    > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
    > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
    >
    > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

    (...)

    > selftests: net/mptcp: diag.sh started failing on 6.1.30-rc1 but
    > passed on 6.3.4-rc1. This is due to changes in latest kselftest
    > (6.3) running on 6.1.
    >
    > test logs:
    > =======
    > # selftests: net/mptcp: diag.sh
    > # no msk on netns creation [ ok ]
    > # listen match for dport 10000 [ ok ]
    > # listen match for sport 10000 [ ok ]
    > # listen match for saddr and sport [ ok ]
    > # all listen sockets [ ok ]
    > # after MPC handshake [ ok ]
    > # ....chk remote_key [ ok ]
    > # ....chk no fallback [ ok ]
    > # ....chk 2 msk in use [ fail ] expected 2 found 0
    > # ....chk 0 msk in use after flush [ ok ]
    > # check fallback [ ok ]
    > # ....chk 1 msk in use [ fail ] expected 1 found 0
    > # ....chk 0 msk in use after flush [ ok ]
    > # many msk socket present [ ok ]
    > # ....chk many msk in use [ fail ] expected
    > 254 found 0
    > # ....chk 0 msk in use after flush [ ok ]
    > not ok 4 selftests: net/mptcp: diag.sh # exit=11
    >
    > logs:
    > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.29-293-ge00a3d96f756/testrun/17163977/suite/kselftest-net-mptcp/test/net_mptcp_diag_sh/history/
    > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.29-293-ge00a3d96f756/testrun/17163977/suite/kselftest-net-mptcp/test/net_mptcp_diag_sh/details/

    Thank you for looking at these MPTCP selftests and for having reported
    these issues.

    We are looking at having MPTCP selftests supporting previous kernel
    versions but that's not easy because our selftests are verifying some
    internal behaviours, not just what is exposed to the uAPI, e.g. what
    network packets are being sent, etc.. Also, some socket options and
    counters -- like what you reported here above with diag.sh -- were
    returning 0 before being implemented in MPTCP: so we need to accept that
    these counters might not work, that's not ideal for a test that wants to
    check if they work :)

    Anyway, for those who wants to follow the evolution, patches have been
    shared on our mailing list:

    https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=749868&state=*
    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/7220c4c22b88
    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/368

    Cheers,
    Matt
    --
    Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
    www.tessares.net

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-05-23 17:11    [W:3.092 / U:1.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site