lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM_PIDFD
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:11:36PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Mikhalitsyn/scm-add-SO_PASSPIDFD-and-SCM_PIDFD/20230517-193620
> base: net-next/main
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517113351.308771-2-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn%40canonical.com
> patch subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM_PIDFD
> config: powerpc-randconfig-s043-20230517
> compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> reproduce:
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # apt-get install sparse
> # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/969a57c99c9d50bfebd0908f5157870b36c271c7
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Alexander-Mikhalitsyn/scm-add-SO_PASSPIDFD-and-SCM_PIDFD/20230517-193620
> git checkout 969a57c99c9d50bfebd0908f5157870b36c271c7
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc olddefconfig
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305202107.BQoPnLYP-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>
> >> ERROR: modpost: "pidfd_prepare" [net/unix/unix.ko] undefined!

TLI, that AF_UNIX can be a kernel module...
I'm really not excited in exposing pidfd_prepare() to non-core kernel
code. Would it be possible to please simply refuse SO_PEERPIDFD and
SCM_PIDFD if AF_UNIX is compiled as a module? I feel that this must be
super rare because it risks breaking even simplistic userspace.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-22 11:48    [W:0.118 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site