lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] amdgpu: validate drm_amdgpu_gem_va addrs for all ops
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:12 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:33 AM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Extend the address and size validations to AMDGPU_VA_OP_UNMAP and
> > > AMDGPU_VA_OP_CLEAR by moving the validations to amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl.
> > >
> > > Internal users of amdgpu_vm_bo_map are no longer validated but they
> > > should be fine.
> > >
> > > Userspace (radeonsi and radv) seems fine as well.
> > Does this series make sense?
>
> I think so, I haven't had a chance to go through this too closely yet,
> but amdgpu_vm_bo_map() is used by ROCm as well so we'd need to make
> sure that removing the checks in patch 1 wouldn't affect that path as
> well. The changes in patch 2 look good. Also, these patches are
> missing your SOB.
Indeed. kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu, for example, does not validate
va. I need to keep the validation in amdgpu_vm_bo_map for it at
least. I guess it is more ideal for kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu to
validate, but I am not familiar with amdkfd..

I can keep the existing validations, and duplicate them in
amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl to cover AMDGPU_VA_OP_UNMAP/AMDGPU_VA_OP_CLEAR.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> Alex

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-21 20:50    [W:0.094 / U:0.920 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site