Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Apr 2023 15:10:45 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT | From | Chris Lew <> |
| |
On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial > TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single > loop. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644 > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel, > int ret; > unsigned long flags; > int chunk_size = len; > - int left_size = 0; > + size_t offset = 0; > > if (!glink->intentless) { > while (!intent) { > @@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel, > iid = intent->id; > } > > - if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) { > - chunk_size = SZ_8K; > - left_size = len - chunk_size; > - } > - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA); > - req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid); > - req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid); > - req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size); > - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size); > - > - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait); > - > - /* Mark intent available if we failed */ > - if (ret) { > - if (intent) > - intent->in_use = false; > - return ret; > - } > - > - while (left_size > 0) { > - data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size); > - chunk_size = left_size; > - if (chunk_size > SZ_8K) > + while (offset < len) { > + chunk_size = len - offset; > + if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))
offset > 0 seems to be a new condition compared to the previous logic. Are we adding this as a cached check because we know if offset is set then fragmented sends are allowed?
I don't think wait would have changed during the loop, so I'm not sure if offset > 0 is adding any extra value to the check.
> chunk_size = SZ_8K; > - left_size -= chunk_size; > > - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT); > + req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT); > req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid); > req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid); > req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size); > - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size); > + req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size); > > - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, > - chunk_size, wait); > - > - /* Mark intent available if we failed */ > + ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait); > if (ret) { > + /* Mark intent available if we failed */ > if (intent) > intent->in_use = false; > - break; > + return ret; > } > + > + offset += chunk_size; > } > - return ret; > + > + return 0; > } > > static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
| |