Messages in this thread | | | From | Andrii Nakryiko <> | Date | Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:42:40 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Dynptr Verifier Adjustments |
| |
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:36 PM Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:39 PM Andrii Nakryiko > <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Don't know, show the sequence of commands you are running? > > > > I have linux source in ~/linux, and KBUILD_OUTPUT set to > > ~/linux-build/default. And it only takes this: > > > > $ cd ~/linux > > $ make -j90 # build kernel > > $ cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf > > $ make -j90 # build selftests > > > > And that's it. > > I've tried the same, modulo some paths. I'm pretty sure it's version > related at this point. > The current issue I'm seeing is "error: indirect call in function, > which are not supported by eBPF" when using GCC-BPF for > progs/bind4_prog.c
I don't think GCC-BPF is able to compile selftests properly just yet. So I guess the problem is that you do have some version of gcc-bpf in the system and selftest's Makefile tries to build gcc variants of test_progs? That's bad (I don't have GCC-BPF locally, and everyone else apparently as well).
So for now just `make BPF_GCC=` ? CC'ing Jose, we should probably agree on some criteria of "GCC-BPF is really capable of building selftests" and adjust Makefile to only attempt GCC BPF build in that case.
> > Currently using clang 16.0.0 and gcc 12.2.0-14. > I did manage to get it to build by just commenting out TEST_GEN_PROGS > += test_progs-bpf_gcc
| |