Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:52:32 -0700 | From | Bjorn Andersson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp: Add ports and orientation-switch |
| |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:21:29AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:40 AM Bjorn Andersson > <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > The QMP combo phy can be connected to a TCPM, a USB controller and a > > DisplayPort controller for handling USB Type-C orientation switching > > and propagating HPD signals. > > > > Extend the binding to allow these connections to be described. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> > > --- > > .../phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp-phy.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp-phy.yaml > > index 3cd5fc3e8fab..c037ac90ce7f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp-phy.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb43dp-phy.yaml > > @@ -60,6 +60,26 @@ properties: > > description: > > See include/dt-bindings/dt-bindings/phy/phy-qcom-qmp.h > > > > + orientation-switch: > > + description: > > + Flag the PHY as possible handler of USB Type-C orientation switching > > + type: boolean > > + > > + ports: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports > > + properties: > > + port@0: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: Output endpoint of the PHY > > + > > + port@1: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base > > + description: Incoming endpoint from the USB controller > > Do you really need this one ? > > The controller doesn't process orientation switching. >
I don't have a need for it, as we can deal with role switching by connecting connector/port@0 to the dwc3.
But if we ever have a need to describe the dwc3 -> QMP -> connector path in the of_graph I think it would look prettier to have USB input as port@1 and DP input as port@2...
Do you have a concern with keeping it around in the DT (the implementation doesn't need to care)?
Regards, Bjorn
| |