Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:56:27 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime |
| |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Erm...it may be an unpopular opinion, but I find that more confusing > than just ensuring that the s_time_gran > 1. I keep wondering if we > might want to carve out other low-order bits too for some later purpose, > at which point trying to check this using flags wouldn't work right. I > think I might just stick with what I have here, at least for now.
But what if I set s_time_gran to 3 or 5? You'd really want a warning about that.
| |