Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:10:25 +0200 | From | Christian Brauner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: reduce ioctl stack usage |
| |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:48:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > > > Andrew picked ocfs2 patches into -mm tree before. > > > > Yup and that's fine obviously, but this belongs to fs/ and we're aiming > > to take fs/ stuff through the dedicated fs trees going forward. > > Er... Assuming that there *is* an active fs tree for filesystem > in question. Do you really want dedicated e.g. affs, adfs, etc. > git trees - one for each filesystem in there?
No, that's not meant or want. What I meant is that when a filesystem doesn't have a dedicated tree (and/or active maintainers) mentioned in the maintainer's file then we pick up those patches just like we already do today and have done.
| |