lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix perf_sample_data not properly initialized for different swevents in perf_tp_event()
From
Date
Hello,

On 2023/4/18 18:25, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:35:23AM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
>
>>> I'm thinking perhaps those flags that update ->dyn_size are the problem?
>>> At the same time, Should you not also then clear dyn_size?
>
>> Yes, according to the code, dyn_size should also be cleared.
>> Maybe we need to change it to the following, which would be more
>> appropriate?
>>
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -10144,14 +10144,14 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void
>> *record, int entry_size,
>> },
>> };
>>
>> - perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, 0);
>> - perf_sample_save_raw_data(&data, &raw);
>> -
>> perf_trace_buf_update(record, event_type);
>>
>> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(event, head, hlist_entry) {
>> - if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs))
>> + if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs)) {
>> + perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, 0);
>> + perf_sample_save_raw_data(&data, &raw);
>> perf_swevent_event(event, count, &data, regs);
>> + }
>> }
>
> That is certainly the safe option. I just went through the list and
> while there's certainly a number of options we'll recompute for naught,
> most of them are indeed either dyn_size or event specific :/
>
> So yeah, please send the above as v2.
>
OK, will send v2 according to above fix solution.

Thanks,
Yang.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-19 03:48    [W:0.051 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site