lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[Regression] Cannot overwrite VID header offset any more [Was: [PATCH] ubi: ensure that VID header offset + VID header size <= alloc, size]
Hello,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:14:44AM -0500, George Kennedy wrote:
> Ensure that the VID header offset + VID header size does not exceed
> the allocated area to avoid slab OOB.
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in crc32_body lib/crc32.c:111 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in crc32_le_generic lib/crc32.c:179 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in crc32_le_base+0x58c/0x626 lib/crc32.c:197
> Read of size 4 at addr ffff88802bb36f00 by task syz-executor136/1555
>
> CPU: 2 PID: 1555 Comm: syz-executor136 Tainted: G W
> 6.0.0-1868 #1
> Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7860+a7792d29
> 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x85/0xad lib/dump_stack.c:106
> print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:317 [inline]
> print_report.cold.13+0xb6/0x6bb mm/kasan/report.c:433
> kasan_report+0xa7/0x11b mm/kasan/report.c:495
> crc32_body lib/crc32.c:111 [inline]
> crc32_le_generic lib/crc32.c:179 [inline]
> crc32_le_base+0x58c/0x626 lib/crc32.c:197
> ubi_io_write_vid_hdr+0x1b7/0x472 drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c:1067
> create_vtbl+0x4d5/0x9c4 drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:317
> create_empty_lvol drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:500 [inline]
> ubi_read_volume_table+0x67b/0x288a drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:812
> ubi_attach+0xf34/0x1603 drivers/mtd/ubi/attach.c:1601
> ubi_attach_mtd_dev+0x6f3/0x185e drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c:965
> ctrl_cdev_ioctl+0x2db/0x347 drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c:1043
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x213 fs/ioctl.c:856
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x86 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x0
> RIP: 0033:0x7f96d5cf753d
> Code:
> RSP: 002b:00007fffd72206f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f96d5cf753d
> RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 0000000040186f40 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 0000000000400cd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400be0
> R13: 00007fffd72207e0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> </TASK>
>
> Allocated by task 1555:
> kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x3d mm/kasan/common.c:38
> kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:45 [inline]
> set_alloc_info mm/kasan/common.c:437 [inline]
> ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:516 [inline]
> __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa3 mm/kasan/common.c:525
> kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:234 [inline]
> __kmalloc+0x138/0x257 mm/slub.c:4429
> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:605 [inline]
> ubi_alloc_vid_buf drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h:1093 [inline]
> create_vtbl+0xcc/0x9c4 drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:295
> create_empty_lvol drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:500 [inline]
> ubi_read_volume_table+0x67b/0x288a drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c:812
> ubi_attach+0xf34/0x1603 drivers/mtd/ubi/attach.c:1601
> ubi_attach_mtd_dev+0x6f3/0x185e drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c:965
> ctrl_cdev_ioctl+0x2db/0x347 drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c:1043
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x213 fs/ioctl.c:856
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x86 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x0
>
> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88802bb36e00
> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256
> The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of
> 256-byte region [ffff88802bb36e00, ffff88802bb36f00)
>
> The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> page:00000000ea4d1263 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
> index:0x0 pfn:0x2bb36
> head:00000000ea4d1263 order:1 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0
> flags: 0xfffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> raw: 000fffffc0010200 ffffea000066c300 dead000000000003 ffff888100042b40
> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> Memory state around the buggy address:
> ffff88802bb36e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ffff88802bb36e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > ffff88802bb36f00: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> ^
> ffff88802bb36f80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> ffff88802bb37000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
> ==================================================================
>
> Fixes: 801c135ce73d ("UBI: Unsorted Block Images")
> Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
> Signed-off-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> index a32050fecabf..53aa4de6b963 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> @@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static int io_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, int max_beb_per1024)
> ubi->ec_hdr_alsize = ALIGN(UBI_EC_HDR_SIZE, ubi->hdrs_min_io_size);
> ubi->vid_hdr_alsize = ALIGN(UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE, ubi->hdrs_min_io_size);
> + if (ubi->vid_hdr_offset && ((ubi->vid_hdr_offset + UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE) >
> + ubi->vid_hdr_alsize)) {
> + ubi_err(ubi, "VID header offset %d too large.", ubi->vid_hdr_offset);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +

This patch is in mainline as 1b42b1a36fc946f0d7088425b90d491b4257ca3e,
and backported to various stable releases.

For me this breaks

ubiattach -m 0 -O 2048

I think the check

ubi->vid_hdr_offset + UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE > ubi->vid_hdr_alsize

is wrong. Without -O passed to ubiattach (and dynamic debug enabled) I
get:

[ 5294.936762] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): sizeof(struct ubi_ainf_peb) 56
[ 5294.936769] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): sizeof(struct ubi_wl_entry) 32
[ 5294.936774] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): min_io_size 2048
[ 5294.936779] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): max_write_size 2048
[ 5294.936783] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): hdrs_min_io_size 512
[ 5294.936787] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): ec_hdr_alsize 512
[ 5294.936791] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): vid_hdr_alsize 512
[ 5294.936796] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): vid_hdr_offset 512
[ 5294.936800] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): vid_hdr_aloffset 512
[ 5294.936804] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): vid_hdr_shift 0
[ 5294.936808] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): leb_start 2048
[ 5294.936812] UBI DBG gen (pid 9619): max_erroneous 409

So the check would only pass for vid_hdr_offset <= 512 -
UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE; note that even specifying the default value 512 (i.e.

ubiattach -m 0 -O 512

) fails the check.

A less strong check would be:

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
index 0904eb40c95f..69c28a862430 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
@@ -666,8 +666,8 @@ static int io_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, int max_beb_per1024)
ubi->ec_hdr_alsize = ALIGN(UBI_EC_HDR_SIZE, ubi->hdrs_min_io_size);
ubi->vid_hdr_alsize = ALIGN(UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE, ubi->hdrs_min_io_size);

- if (ubi->vid_hdr_offset && ((ubi->vid_hdr_offset + UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE) >
- ubi->vid_hdr_alsize)) {
+ if (ubi->vid_hdr_offset &&
+ ubi->vid_hdr_offset + UBI_VID_HDR_SIZE > ubi->peb_size) {
ubi_err(ubi, "VID header offset %d too large.", ubi->vid_hdr_offset);
return -EINVAL;
}
But I'm unsure if this would be too lax?!

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-17 18:02    [W:0.065 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site