Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:20:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: realtek,otto-wdt: simplify requiring interrupt-names | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 16/04/2023 21:00, Sander Vanheule wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 11:51 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Required properties should be listed in "required:" block. Since >> interrupts are already there, the dependency of interrupt-names on the >> interrupts can be simplified. > > Maybe I'm not reading this right, but isn't the dependency stated in the binding > "interrupts requires interrupt-names to be present"? resource-names.txt > describes the reverse dependency ("interrupt-names is only meaningful with an > associated interrupts").
The interrupts are already required by the binding, so the dependency, which makes interrupts depending on presence of interrupt-names, effectively was making the names required.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |