lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/8] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Add PMI632 support
From


On 14.04.2023 01:17, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add support for the 8 GPIOs found on PMI632.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> ---
As I've started doing more and more lately, I'll hijack this
patch to discuss the general approach..

I have a feeling that you'll get some comments about
this match list growing, especially since the driver data
is already filled in dt (gpio-ranges).. perhaps we can improve
this..

Especially considering the "qcom,spmi-gpio" fallback is there
(unless we care about 2015 DTs like 0804308fdd3c) that are
unlikely to still work nowadays. Old DTs also used interrupts=<>
to list out all the GPIOs (among the other SPMI fluff) individually
(see e.g. 5f540fb4821a).

Krzysztof, WDYT? Would it be worth taking all of that old junk into
account, or should we keep it as-is?

Konrad
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> index ea3485344f06..40cab13e5a83 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> @@ -1232,6 +1232,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pmic_gpio_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,pm8994-gpio", .data = (void *) 22 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pm8998-gpio", .data = (void *) 26 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pma8084-gpio", .data = (void *) 22 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pmi632-gpio", .data = (void *) 8 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8950-gpio", .data = (void *) 2 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-gpio", .data = (void *) 10 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", .data = (void *) 14 },
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-14 01:28    [W:0.091 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site