lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the block tree
From
On 4/12/23 10:35 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/12/23 10:25?AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter, what do you think, should we make track uaccess state across
>>>> function boundaries?
>>>
>>> So IIRC the goal was to explicitly dis-allow that. You want minimal code
>>> executed with STAC and hence disallow calling stuff.
>>
>> I guess I was wondering if we could make an exception for calls to
>> static IPA-optimized functions, so we wouldn't have to scramble to "fix"
>> compiler optimizations.
>>
>> But for now, yeah let's just keep it simple.
>>
>> Jens, can you confirm this works? I added __noclone instead of removing
>> static.
>
> Yep, works for me.

Want me to slap that patch on top of the branch that has the commit
that causes it?

--
Jens Axboe


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-12 18:46    [W:0.220 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site