lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 02/18] timer: Add comment to get_next_timer_interrupt() description
    On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:17:28PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
    > get_next_timer_interrupt() does more than simply getting the next timer
    > interrupt. The timer bases are forwarded and also marked as idle whenever
    > possible.
    >
    > To get not confused, add a comment to function description.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
    > ---
    > v5: New patch, which adds only a comment to get_next_timer_interrupt()
    > instead of changing the function name
    > ---
    > kernel/time/timer.c | 4 ++++
    > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
    >
    > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
    > index 63a8ce7177dd..ffb94bc3852f 100644
    > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
    > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
    > @@ -1915,6 +1915,10 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
    > * @basej: base time jiffies
    > * @basem: base time clock monotonic
    > *
    > + * If required, base->clk is forwarded and base is also marked as
    > + * idle. Idle handling of timer bases is allowed only to be done by CPU
    > + * itself.

    Idle marking you mean? Because idle handling can be done remotely after
    this patchset.

    Thanks.

    > + *
    > * Returns the tick aligned clock monotonic time of the next pending
    > * timer or KTIME_MAX if no timer is pending.
    > */
    > --
    > 2.30.2
    >

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-04-11 11:39    [W:4.107 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site