lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: rq lock contention due to commit af7f588d8f73
From
On 2023-03-27 04:05, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I was doing some optimization work[1] for kernel scheduler using a
> database workload: sysbench+postgres and before I submit my work, I
> rebased my patch on top of latest v6.3-rc kernels to see if everything
> still works expected and then I found rq's lock became very heavily
> contended as compared to v6.2 based kernels.
>
> Using the above mentioned workload, before commit af7f588d8f73("sched:
> Introduce per-memory-map concurrency ID"), the profile looked like:
>
> 7.30% 0.71% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __schedule
> 0.03% 0.03% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>
> After that commit:
>
> 49.01% 0.87% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __schedule
> 43.20% 43.18% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>
> The above profile was captured with sysbench's nr_threads set to 56; if
> I used more thread number, the contention would be more severe on that
> 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids server.
>
> The docker image I used to do optimization work is not available outside
> but I managed to reproduce this problem using only publicaly available
> stuffs, here it goes:
> 1 docker pull postgres
> 2 sudo docker run --rm --name postgres-instance -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=mypass -e POSTGRES_USER=sbtest -d postgres -c shared_buffers=80MB -c max_connections=250
> 3 go inside the container
> sudo docker exec -it $the_just_started_container_id bash
> 4 install sysbench inside container
> sudo apt update and sudo apt install sysbench
> 5 prepare
> root@container:/# sysbench --db-driver=pgsql --pgsql-user=sbtest --pgsql_password=mypass --pgsql-db=sbtest --pgsql-port=5432 --tables=16 --table-size=10000 --threads=56 --time=60 --report-interval=2 /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua prepare
> 6 run
> root@container:/# sysbench --db-driver=pgsql --pgsql-user=sbtest --pgsql_password=mypass --pgsql-db=sbtest --pgsql-port=5432 --tables=16 --table-size=10000 --threads=56 --time=60 --report-interval=2 /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua run
>
> Let it warm up a little bit and after 10-20s you can do profile and see
> the increased rq lock contention. You may need a machine that has at
> least 56 cpus to see this, I didn't try on other machines.
>
> Feel free to let me know if you need any other info.

While I setup my dev machine with this reproducer, here are a few
questions to help figure out the context:

I understand that pgsql is a multi-process database. Is it strictly
single-threaded per-process, or does each process have more than
one thread ?

I understand that your workload is scheduling between threads which
belong to different processes. Are there more heavily active threads
than there are scheduler runqueues (CPUs) on your machine ?

When I developed the mm_cid feature, I originally implemented two additional
optimizations:

Additional optimizations can be done if the spin locks added when
context switching between threads belonging to different memory maps end
up being a performance bottleneck. Those are left out of this patch
though. A performance impact would have to be clearly demonstrated to
justify the added complexity.

I suspect that your workload demonstrates the need for at least one of those
optimizations. I just wonder if we are in a purely single-threaded scenario
for each process, or if each process has many threads.

Thanks,

Mathieu


>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230327053955.GA570404@ziqianlu-desk2/
>
> Best wishes,
> Aaron

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 15:20    [W:0.118 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site