Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:02:18 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qusb2: Document IPQ9574 compatible | From | Dmitry Baryshkov <> |
| |
On 27/03/2023 12:30, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Document the compatible string used for the qusb2 phy in IPQ9574. > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> > > --- > Changes in v4: > - Remove constraints not applicable to IPQ9574
I don't think this is a correct way to go
> Changes in v3: > - Maintain the proper sorted order > > Changes in v2: > - Moved ipq6018 to the proper place and placed ipq9574 > next to it as suggested by Dmitry > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > index 7f403e7..3cb27da 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > @@ -18,13 +18,14 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - items: > - enum: > + - qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy > - qcom,ipq8074-qusb2-phy > + - qcom,ipq9574-qusb2-phy > - qcom,msm8953-qusb2-phy > - qcom,msm8996-qusb2-phy > - qcom,msm8998-qusb2-phy > - qcom,qcm2290-qusb2-phy > - qcom,sdm660-qusb2-phy > - - qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy > - qcom,sm4250-qusb2-phy > - qcom,sm6115-qusb2-phy > - items: > @@ -157,9 +158,6 @@ required: > - "#phy-cells" > - clocks > - clock-names > - - vdd-supply > - - vdda-pll-supply > - - vdda-phy-dpdm-supply
So, how does ipq9574 power on the PHY?
> - resets > > allOf:
-- With best wishes Dmitry
| |