Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:25:34 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] scsi: limit to set the host state | From | Bart Van Assche <> |
| |
On 3/24/23 18:17, Ye Bin wrote: > From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > > Now, we can set the host state with any value. Actually, it doesn't > make sense. As previous patch introduce SHOST_BLOCKED state, set this > state, it will blocking IO. So this patch limit to set the host with > running/blocked state. > > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > index b14f95ac594e..42c5936c7711 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ store_shost_state(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > int i; > struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev); > enum scsi_host_state state = 0; > + enum scsi_host_state old_state; > unsigned long flags; > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(shost_states); i++) { > @@ -216,8 +217,13 @@ store_shost_state(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > if (!state) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (state != SHOST_RUNNING && state != SHOST_BLOCKED) > + return -EINVAL; > + > spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags); > - if (scsi_host_set_state(shost, state)) { > + old_state = shost->shost_state; > + if ((old_state != SHOST_RUNNING && old_state != SHOST_BLOCKED) || > + scsi_host_set_state(shost, state)) { > spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags); > return -EINVAL; > }
Please make sure that the "state != SHOST_RUNNING && state != SHOST_BLOCKED" check occurs only once and also that there is one spin_lock_irqsave() call in this function and only one spin_unlock_irqrestore() call.
Thanks,
Bart.
| |