lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] edits in greybus driver
From

On ٢١‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ١٨:٣٩, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>
>> On ٢١/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٣:٤٦, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patchset includes change happened in greybus driver in three
>>>> different files two of them patch one and three related to
>>>> checkpatch issue and in second patch convert two
>>>> `container_of` macros into inline functions.
>>>>
>>>> Menna Mahmoud (3):
>>>> staging: greybus: remove unnecessary blank line
>>>> staging: greybus: use inline function for macros
>>>> staging: greybus: remove unnecessary blank line
>>> Different patches should have different subject lines.
>> But I have already the same edit in both file, so should I re-write the
>> subject for one of them?
>>> You need to either
>>> be more specific about the file affected or merge the two patches with the
>>> same subject into one.
>> each patch related to different file. So, Can I to merge two commits for
>> different files but have the same edit in one patch?
> They are both for greybus, which is what you advertise in the subject
> line. And the sense of the changes is the same, and the changes are quite
> simple. So I think you could just put them in one patch. If you find
> other occurrences of the problem in greybus you could make one patch that
> fixes all of them.
>
>> but in this case no need to create patchset for all changes in `greybus`
>> driver, right?
> A patchset is needed if the changes affect the same file, because there
> might be complications if the patches are applied in the wrong order.
>
>> If okay with that, should I versioning the patches to resend them again, or
>> should add "RESEND" subject prefix?
> RESEND would be if you send exactly the same thing, because some time has
> passed and you are worried that the patch has been lost. Now that you
> have put these in a series, it is perhaps best to leave them in a series
> and increase the version number, to avoid confusion on the part of people
> reading the patches.
>
> julia


understood, thanks Julia.


Menna

>
>> please tell me the best way to resend these patches, appreciate your help.
>>
>>
>> Menna
>>
>>
>>> julia
>>>
>>>> drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h | 10 ++++++++--
>>>> drivers/staging/greybus/greybus_authentication.h | 1 -
>>>> drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:11    [W:3.349 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site