lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx290: fix conditional function defintions
From
On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>>
>>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
>>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
>>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>> ^
>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> ^
>>>>
>>
>> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks
>> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly
>> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is
>> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards
>> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus?
>
> Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in
> Mauro's tree now.

Ahh, great, many thx.

I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/

Ciao, Thorsten

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:08    [W:0.042 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site