lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mtrr: support setting MTRR state for software defined MTRRs
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Since this code covers TDX guest too, I think eventually it makes sense for TDX
> > guest to use this function too (to avoid #VE IIUC). If want to do that, then I
> > think TDX guest should have the same mutual understanding with *ALL* hypervisor,
> > as I am not sure what's the point of making the TDX guest's MTRR behaviour
> > depending on specific hypervisor.
>
> This series tries to fix the current fallout.

We can relax the check so that it runs on TDX too. Along with a comment
above it why it needs to run on TDX.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 01:10    [W:0.175 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site