Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:42:56 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mtrr: support setting MTRR state for software defined MTRRs |
| |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Since this code covers TDX guest too, I think eventually it makes sense for TDX > > guest to use this function too (to avoid #VE IIUC). If want to do that, then I > > think TDX guest should have the same mutual understanding with *ALL* hypervisor, > > as I am not sure what's the point of making the TDX guest's MTRR behaviour > > depending on specific hypervisor. > > This series tries to fix the current fallout.
We can relax the check so that it runs on TDX too. Along with a comment above it why it needs to run on TDX.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |