Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jacob Pan <> | Subject | [PATCH v7 5/7] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:59:08 -0700 |
| |
We’re not using spinlock-protected IOASID allocation anymore, there’s no need for GFP_ATOMIC.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c index 48e8a15ddc9b..c434b95dc8eb 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t ma goto out; } - ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (ret < 0) + ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max, GFP_KERNEL); + if (ret < min) goto out; mm->pasid = ret; ret = 0; -- 2.25.1
| |