Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:02:54 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning | From | Raghavendra K T <> |
| |
On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T >> <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> wrote: >> >>> The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning >>> suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3]. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> include/linux/mm.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 +++++++ >>> kernel/fork.c | 2 ++ >>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> mm/memory.c | 3 +++ >> >> It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these. >> >> But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks" >> patchset, and there might be functional issues as well. So mm.git >> would be the better choice. >> >> Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)? Hopefully the >> sched developers can take a look and provide feedback. >> > > Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that. >
Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,
Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com/T/#t
| |