lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning
From
On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T
>> <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
>>> suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>   include/linux/mm.h       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/linux/mm_types.h |  9 +++++++
>>>   kernel/fork.c            |  2 ++
>>>   kernel/sched/fair.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   mm/memory.c              |  3 +++
>>
>> It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.
>>
>> But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
>> patchset, and there might be functional issues as well.  So mm.git
>> would be the better choice.
>>
>> Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
>> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)?  Hopefully the
>> sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.
>>
>
> Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.
>

Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,

Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com/T/#t


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:39    [W:0.046 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site