Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | [PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:13:55 -0800 |
| |
Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported by codespell.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis. Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.
| |