lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling
    Date
    Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported
    by codespell.

    Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
    Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
    Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
    Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
    Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
    Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
    Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    ---
    Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +-
    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

    diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
    --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
    +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
    @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was
    then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis.

    Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer
    -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava
    +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have
    priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time
    kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-03-27 00:16    [W:4.160 / U:0.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site