Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:57:17 +0100 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND] soc: qcom-geni-se: Update Tx and Rx fifo depth based on QUP HW version |
| |
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:54:13PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote: > > On 2/6/2023 11:39 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > A:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post > > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > > > A: No. > > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? > > Apologies will take care. > > > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top > > > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:36:49PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote: > > > Added RESEND for resubmission of first version which is not modified in any > > > way from the previous submission. > > > > Then why was it resent? What will cause this to be accepted when the > > previous submission was not? > > > > confused, > > > > greg k-h > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/11/21/549 > > I had posted the same patch in November last year but did not receive any > response in spite of periodic reminders. > > Suspecting that the patch did not reach all the required recipients > re-posted the same and hence RESEND.
When you resend, you need to say _why_ it was resent. "adding more people" is a valid reason, don't make us guess.
Remember, some of us get hundreds of patches a day/week to review, we have no saved context.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |