Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Feb 2023 00:02:19 +0200 | From | Vladimir Oltean <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add vlan support |
| |
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:38:04AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > + /* Enable TAG always mode for the port, this is actually controlled > > + * by VLAN_IN_MODE_ENA field which will be used for PVID insertion > > + */ > > + reg = A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_TAG_ALWAYS; > > + reg <<= A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_PORT_SHIFT(port); > > + a5psw_reg_rmw(a5psw, A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE, A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_PORT(port), > > + reg); > > If we always enable VLAN mode, which VLAN ID do switch ports not part of a > VLAN aware bridge get classified into?
Good question. I'd guess 0, since otherwise, the VLAN-unaware FDB entries added with a5psw_port_fdb_add() wouldn't work.
But the driver has to survive the following chain of commands, which, by looking at the current code structure, it doesn't:
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 ip link set swp0 master br0 # PVID should remain at a value chosen privately by the driver bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 100 pvid untagged # PVID should not change in hardware yet ip link set br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 # PVID should change to 100 now ip link set br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 # PVID should change to the value chosen by the driver
Essentially, what I'm saying is that VLANs added with "bridge vlan add" should only be active while vlan_filtering=1.
If you search for "commit_pvid" in drivers/net/dsa, you'll find a number of drivers which have a more elaborate code structure which allows the commands above to work properly.
| |