Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:39:45 -0800 | From | Jaegeuk Kim <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] f2fs: add sysfs nodes to set last_age_weight |
| |
On 02/07, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2023/2/4 17:43, qixiaoyu1 wrote: > > Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> > > Signed-off-by: xiongping1 <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> > > --- > > change log v3 -> v4: > > - allow 0 and 100 to a valid value > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 5 +++++ > > fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + > > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > > index 9e3756625a81..11af7dbb6bc9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > > @@ -669,3 +669,8 @@ Contact: "Ping Xiong" <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> > > Description: When DATA SEPARATION is on, it controls the age threshold to indicate > > the data blocks as warm. By default it was initialized as 2621440 blocks > > (equals to 10GB). > > + > > +What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/last_age_weight > > +Date: January 2023 > > +Contact: "Ping Xiong" <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> > > +Description: When DATA SEPARATION is on, it controls the weight of last data block age. > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > > index d9f12f404beb..ce99882ba81c 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > > @@ -871,19 +871,21 @@ void f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range_compressed(struct inode *inode, > > } > > #endif > > -static unsigned long long __calculate_block_age(unsigned long long new, > > +static unsigned long long __calculate_block_age(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > + unsigned long long new, > > unsigned long long old) > > { > > unsigned int rem_old, rem_new; > > unsigned long long res; > > + unsigned int weight = sbi->last_age_weight; > > - res = div_u64_rem(new, 100, &rem_new) * (100 - LAST_AGE_WEIGHT) > > - + div_u64_rem(old, 100, &rem_old) * LAST_AGE_WEIGHT; > > + res = div_u64_rem(new, 100, &rem_new) * (100 - weight) > > + + div_u64_rem(old, 100, &rem_old) * weight; > > if (rem_new) > > - res += rem_new * (100 - LAST_AGE_WEIGHT) / 100; > > + res += rem_new * (100 - weight) / 100; > > if (rem_old) > > - res += rem_old * LAST_AGE_WEIGHT / 100; > > + res += rem_old * weight / 100; > > return res; > > } > > @@ -917,7 +919,7 @@ static int __get_new_block_age(struct inode *inode, struct extent_info *ei, > > cur_age = ULLONG_MAX - tei.last_blocks + cur_blocks; > > if (tei.age) > > - ei->age = __calculate_block_age(cur_age, tei.age); > > + ei->age = __calculate_block_age(sbi, cur_age, tei.age); > > else > > ei->age = cur_age; > > ei->last_blocks = cur_blocks; > > @@ -1233,6 +1235,7 @@ void f2fs_init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > atomic64_set(&sbi->allocated_data_blocks, 0); > > sbi->hot_data_age_threshold = DEF_HOT_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD; > > sbi->warm_data_age_threshold = DEF_WARM_DATA_AGE_THRESHOLD; > > + sbi->last_age_weight = LAST_AGE_WEIGHT; > > } > > int __init f2fs_create_extent_cache(void) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > index e8953c3dc81a..c3609cbc28c7 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > @@ -1679,6 +1679,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { > > /* The threshold used for hot and warm data seperation*/ > > unsigned int hot_data_age_threshold; > > unsigned int warm_data_age_threshold; > > + unsigned int last_age_weight; > > /* basic filesystem units */ > > unsigned int log_sectors_per_block; /* log2 sectors per block */ > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > index 83a366f3ee80..cd2fb52d1f3c 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > @@ -686,6 +686,15 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a, > > return count; > > } > > + if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "last_age_weight")) { > > + if (t < 0 || t > 100) > > t is unsigned long variable, should never be less than 0. > > Otherwise, it looks good to me, maybe Jaegeuk could fix it manually.
Ok, applied.
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> > > Thanks, > > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (t == *ui) > > + return count; > > + *ui = (unsigned int)t; > > + return count; > > + } > > + > > *ui = (unsigned int)t; > > return count; > > @@ -944,6 +953,7 @@ F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, revoked_atomic_block, revoked_atomic_block) > > /* For block age extent cache */ > > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, hot_data_age_threshold, hot_data_age_threshold); > > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, warm_data_age_threshold, warm_data_age_threshold); > > +F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, last_age_weight, last_age_weight); > > #define ATTR_LIST(name) (&f2fs_attr_##name.attr) > > static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = { > > @@ -1042,6 +1052,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = { > > ATTR_LIST(revoked_atomic_block), > > ATTR_LIST(hot_data_age_threshold), > > ATTR_LIST(warm_data_age_threshold), > > + ATTR_LIST(last_age_weight), > > NULL, > > }; > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(f2fs);
| |