Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:46:25 +0100 | From | Guru Mehar Rachaputi <> | Subject | Re: Regarding checkpatch camelcase issues |
| |
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 02:40:41PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 05:25:38AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote: > > Thanks for your support. > > > > I wanted to confirm if each checkpatch encounter for camelcase issue should > > be fixed in a new patch? > > > > For example: If the issue is with same variable, then multiple > > modifications can be made in one patch. > > > > -> above example is OK > > > > > > For example: If the issue is with multiple variables, then multiple > > modifications can be made in one patch. > > > > -> above example is NOT OK / NG > > > > > > Please confirm me if my understanding is correct? > > > > I guess you have generated a patch series, then check it through > checkpatch. > > Indeed, if checkpatch complains at a particular patch, you need to do > interactive rebase. Make sure that rebase todo list contains "edit" > lines on commit you want to fix up. After that, fix these complaints. > > When you're done, regenerate the patch series and make sure that there > are no checkpatch complains on it. > > Thanks. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Thanks for the reply I guess I was not clear. When I run checkpatch on a driver there were so many camelcase issues in each file. So I wanted to know if I proceed to fix them, should I submit each change as a patch or each file as a patch? Since each file has many camelcase issue and the driver has morethan one such file.
-- Thanks & Regards, Guru
| |