lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg
From
On 22.02.2023 18:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:35:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>> Andrzej Hajda (7):
>> arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg
>> linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg
>> arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr
>> llist: simplify __llist_del_all
>> io_uring: use __xchg if possible
>> qed: use __xchg if possible
>> drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper
>
> Nothing crazy in here I suppose, I somewhat wonder why you went through
> the trouble, but meh.

If you are asking why I have proposed this patchset, then the answer is
simple, 1st I've tried to find a way to move internal i915 helper to
core (see patch 7).
Then I was looking for possible other users of this helper. And
apparently there are many of them, patches 3-7 shows some.


>
> You want me to take this through te locking tree (for the next cycle,
> not this one) where I normally take atomic things or does someone else
> want this?

If you could take it I will be happy.

Regards
Andrzej

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:34    [W:0.160 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site