Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Feb 2023 22:24:19 +0100 | Subject | Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg | From | Andrzej Hajda <> |
| |
On 22.02.2023 18:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:35:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> Andrzej Hajda (7): >> arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg >> linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg >> arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr >> llist: simplify __llist_del_all >> io_uring: use __xchg if possible >> qed: use __xchg if possible >> drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper > > Nothing crazy in here I suppose, I somewhat wonder why you went through > the trouble, but meh.
If you are asking why I have proposed this patchset, then the answer is simple, 1st I've tried to find a way to move internal i915 helper to core (see patch 7). Then I was looking for possible other users of this helper. And apparently there are many of them, patches 3-7 shows some.
> > You want me to take this through te locking tree (for the next cycle, > not this one) where I normally take atomic things or does someone else > want this?
If you could take it I will be happy.
Regards Andrzej
| |