Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:17:31 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som and pcm-959 dev board | From | Andrew Davis <> |
| |
On 2/23/23 10:25 AM, Colin Foster wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: >> On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote: >>> Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and >>> the Phytec PCM-959 development kit. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> >>> --- >>> >>> v4 >>> * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> >>> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml >> >> How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make >> the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this >> series? > > Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk > off devices one at a time? > > If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple > rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable) > this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit > before you sent your patch set. > > > Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following: > > 1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit. > 2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done > it should be an easy rebase before submission. > 3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update. > > > I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your > priorities list.
Low priority for me, I'd suggest #1 or they probably will not be converted anytime soon.
Andrew
| |