lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 0/7] revert RNG seed mess
    On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:32:58AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
    > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:12:23PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
    > > All attempts to fix up passing RNG seed via setup_data entry failed.
    > > Let's just rip out all of it. We'll start over.
    > >
    > >
    > > Warning: all I did was git revert the relevant patches and resolve the
    > > (trivial) conflicts. Not even compiled - it's almost midnight here.
    > >
    > > Jason this is the kind of approach I'd like to see, not yet another
    > > pointer math rich patch I need to spend time reviewing. Just get us back
    > > to where we started. We can redo "x86: use typedef for SetupData struct"
    > > later if we want, it's benign.
    >
    > This approach looks suitable for applying to the 7.2 tree too,
    > which will be good for fixing the regressions in stable.

    Since no further alternative has been proposed, can you consider sending
    a pull request for this series. This has been broken for too long and
    many users & vendors are looking for an official fix to be applied to
    master before they backport to 7.2

    With regards,
    Daniel
    --
    |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
    |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
    |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-03-27 00:28    [W:3.059 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site