lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with the net-next tree
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:14:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
>
> between commit:
>
> fe298bdf6f65 ("net/mlx5: Prepare for fast crypto key update if hardware supports it")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> 2fd0e75727a8 ("net/mlx5e: Propagate an internal event in case uplink netdev changes")
>
> from the mlx5-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> index 234334194b38,cc48aa308269..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> @@@ -674,7 -675,7 +675,8 @@@ struct mlx5e_resources
> } hw_objs;
> struct devlink_port dl_port;
> struct net_device *uplink_netdev;
> + struct mlx5_crypto_dek_priv *dek_priv;
> + struct mutex uplink_netdev_lock;
> };
>
> enum mlx5_sw_icm_type {

LGTM, thanks for the conflict resolution.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:07    [W:0.030 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site