lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed() to not filter offline CPUs
From

On 2/2/23 15:53, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> On 2/2/23 15:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:46:02PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>> I will work on a patchset to do that as a counter offer.
>>>> We will need a small and simple patch for /urgent, or I will need to
>>>> revert all your patches -- your call.
>>>>
>>>> I also don't tihnk you fully appreciate the ramifications of
>>>> task_cpu_possible_mask(), cpuset currently gets that quite wrong.
>>> OK, I don't realize the urgency of that. If it is that urgent, I
>>> will have
>>> no objection to get it in for now. We can improve it later on. So
>>> are you
>>> planning to get it into the current 6.2 rc or 6.3?
>>>
>>> Tejun, are you OK with that as you are the cgroup maintainer?
>> Yeah, gotta fix the regression but is there currently a solution
>> which fixes
>> the regression but doesn't further break other stuff?
>
> I believe there is a better way to do that, but it will need more time
> to flex out. Since cpuset_cpus_allowed() is only used by
> kernel/sched/core.c, Peter will be responsible if it somehow breaks
> other stuff.

Maybe my cpuset patch that don't update task's cpumask on cpu offline
event can help. However, I don't know the exact scenario where the
regression happen, so it may not.

Cheers,
Longman

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:08    [W:0.080 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site