Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:55:14 +0100 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/1] rasdaemon: Fix poll() on per_cpu trace_pipe_raw blocks indefinitely | From | "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <> |
| |
On 16.02.23 14:40, Shiju Jose wrote: > Hello, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) >> <regressions@leemhuis.info> >> Sent: 16 February 2023 11:48 >> To: rostedt@goodmis.org >> Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-trace- >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>; Jonathan >> Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; Linuxarm >> <linuxarm@huawei.com>; Linux kernel regressions list >> <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>; >> mchehab@kernel.org; linux-edac@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/1] rasdaemon: Fix poll() on per_cpu >> trace_pipe_raw blocks indefinitely >> >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. > > Kernel fix patch for this issue is already in the mainline. Please see the commit > 3e46d910d8acf94e5360126593b68bf4fee4c4a1 > ("tracing: Fix poll() and select() do not work on per_cpu trace_pipe and trace_pipe_raw")
Great, thx for letting me know.
>> On 04.02.23 20:33, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote: >>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> >>> >>> The error events are not received in the rasdaemon since kernel 6.1-rc6. >>> This issue is firstly detected and reported, when testing the CXL >>> error events in the rasdaemon. >> >> Thanks for working on this. This submission looks stalled, unless I missed >> something. This is unfortunate, as this afaics is fixing a regression (caused by a >> commit from Steven). Hence it would be good to get this fixed rather sooner >> than later. Or is the RFC in the subject the reason why there was no progress? Is >> it maybe time to remove it? > > I made the pull request for this rasdaemon patch here, > https://github.com/mchehab/rasdaemon/pull/86
Ha, stupid me, I didn't even notice this thread was about a rasdaemon change (I landed here as the patch description liked to the tracked regression report). Apologies for mixing this up; I deal with a lot of regression reports and try to avoid mistakes like this, but they nevertheless happen. :-/
Ciao, Thorsten
| |