Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Philippe Schenker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtc: allow rtc_read_alarm without read_alarm callback | Date | Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:00:43 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 23:27 +0100, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com wrote: > From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > > .read_alarm is not necessary to read the current alarm because it is > recorded in the aie_timer and so rtc_read_alarm() will never call > rtc_read_alarm_internal() which is the only function calling the > callback. > > Reported-by: Zhipeng Wang <zhipeng.wang_1@nxp.com> > Reported-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > Fixes: 7ae41220ef58 ("rtc: introduce features bitfield") > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>
I tested on our SoMs Colibri iMX8X and Apalis iMX8
I used the variants that had i.MX 8QXP and i.MX 8QM placed. This patch did solve the problem we currently have. I also wanted to mention that I could not get them to run on a mainline kernel in a acceptable time- frame so I tested on Toradex's kernel that is based on NXP's Kernel. [1]
[1] https://git.toradex.com/cgit/linux-toradex.git/log/?h=toradex_5.15-2.1.x-imx
> --- > drivers/rtc/interface.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c > index 7c30cb3c764d..499d89150afc 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ int rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct > rtc_wkalrm *alarm) > return err; > if (!rtc->ops) { > err = -ENODEV; > - } else if (!test_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, rtc->features) || > !rtc->ops->read_alarm) { > + } else if (!test_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, rtc->features)) { > err = -EINVAL; > } else { > memset(alarm, 0, sizeof(struct rtc_wkalrm));
| |