lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 596/606] watchdog: ziirave_wdt: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
From
On 2/11/23 15:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:32:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:57:47PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:45:30PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>>>
>>>> The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
>>>> can be trivially converted.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>
>> This patch hasn't made it into next yet. Is it still on your radar?
>>
>> My plans for this series is to complete the conversion after the next
>> merge window which should include most patches from this series.
>>
>> So I ask you to either take this patch during the next merge window or
>> accept that it will be applied together with the i2c core conversion
>> that drops .probe() with the i2c_device_id parameter.
>
> This got Guenter's R-b tag twice now, but the patch didn't appear yet in
> next. I'll prepare a series for Wolfram to apply via his i2c tree based
> on what is in next during the merge window with the idea to get the
> change early into next with an immutable tag. If you get this patch in
> during the merge window that would be ideal, but if not, I will take
> care of it and as announced will send it together with the i2c change.
>

It is in my watchdog-next tree, and we can only hope that Wim
will pick it up from there.

Guenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:19    [W:0.676 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site