Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 21 Dec 2023 08:32:11 -0700 | Subject | Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree | From | Jens Axboe <> |
| |
On 12/21/23 5:29 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different >>> commits (but the same patches): >>> >>> 24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper") >>> 253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())") >>> 372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work") >>> 4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()") >>> 7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open") >>> a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g") >>> eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()") >> >> Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be >> the case. Christian? > > Nope, vfs.file definitely didn't get rebased. That was just me being > stupid and not merging vfs.file cleanly into vfs.all. Sorry about this. > Fixed now.
OK good, thanks!
-- Jens Axboe
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |